Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMcWhirter, Paula
dc.contributor.authorRiggin, Brittany M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T16:45:47Z
dc.date.available2020-07-10T16:45:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/325152
dc.description.abstractVictim-blaming and self-blame in the literature have repeatedly been shown to impact psychological distress in individuals who have been sexually victimized. Three key variables have been implicated in victim-blaming behavior: rape myth acceptance, ambivalent sexism, and empathy. Presently, there has been an absence of research examining these variables together across populations who have been sexually victimized, perpetrated sexual victimization, experienced both, or experienced neither. Additionally, relationships between these variables and psychological distress in adults who have been sexually victimized have yet to be examined. Results were hindered by small sample sizes but confirmed gender effects across variables, suggest that rape myth acceptance may be implicated in psychological well-being of victims, and indicate that individuals who have experienced both perpetration and victimization may differ in these factors compared to other groups. Keywords: victim-blaming, sexual assault, distress, victimization, perpetrationen_US
dc.subjectrape mythen_US
dc.subjectempathyen_US
dc.subjectsexismen_US
dc.subjectwell-beingen_US
dc.titleRape Myth Acceptance, Sexism, and Empathy Across Populations and as Predictors of Post-Assault Functioningen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHeddy, Benjamin
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMcLeod, David
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFernando, Delini
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDavidson, Tim
dc.date.manuscript2020-04-27
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Psychologyen_US
shareok.nativefileaccessrestricteden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record