Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHardt, Jan
dc.contributor.authorMatney, T. Drake
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T14:40:07Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T14:40:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.other(AlmaMMSId)9982579685302196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/325056
dc.description.abstractThe specific type of voting machine used by voters could have an affect on the amount of confidence they feel about the accuracy of their votes being recorded. This thesis studies different types of voting machines and the ramifications they have on voters. Using a survey of more than 400 people, this paper seeks to find a relationship between different methods of voting and the amount of confidence a voter feels. The results show that voters who interface with a voting machine that leaves a paper trail are more likely to feel confident that their votes are recorded correctly. The antiquated federal system for updating voting equipment should be changed so that states receive a yearly appropriation to keep their voting technology up-to-date.
dc.rightsAll rights reserved by the author, who has granted UCO Chambers Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its online repositories. Contact UCO Chambers Library's Digital Initiatives Working Group at diwg@uco.edu for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.subject.lcshVoting-machines
dc.subject.lcshElections
dc.titleBinary democracy : voter confidence and voting technologies.
dc.typeAcademic theses
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEakins, Keith Rollin, 1963-
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWood, John, 1960-
dc.thesis.degreeM.A., Political Science
dc.identifier.oclc(OCoLC)on1035374500
uco.groupUCO - Graduate Works and Theses::UCO - Theses
thesis.degree.grantorJackson College of Graduate Studies.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record