Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBanas, John
dc.contributor.authorKang, Dingyi
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T21:34:02Z
dc.date.available2020-05-08T21:34:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/324351
dc.description.abstractThis thesis integrates social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954) and psychological reactance theory (Brehm, 1966) to examine the effects of controlling language and comparison types on psychological reactance and attitudes. Two 3 (comparison types: upward contrast vs. no contrast vs. downward contrast) × 2 (controlling language: high vs. low) independent group experiments were conducted. Both studies revealed main effects of controlling language on perceived threat to personal freedom and anger in response to the message. The results also revealed the main effects of comparison types on anger to the messages and attitude to recycling. For anger to the message, there were no interaction effects between comparison types and controlling language on it in neither of these studies. However, for attitude to recycling, Study 1 revealed that the effect of controlling language on it could be overwhelmed and neutralized by the effects of both upward contrast and downward contrast on it.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectpsychological reactance theoryen_US
dc.subjectsocial comparison theoryen_US
dc.subjectcomparison typesen_US
dc.subjectcontrolling languageen_US
dc.subjectpersuasionen_US
dc.titleExamining the Influence of Social Comparison on Psychological Reactanceen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBessarabova, Elena
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMeirick, Patrick
dc.date.manuscript2020-05-06
dc.thesis.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Communicationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record