Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAsino, Tutaleni I.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Wilmon, III
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-30T15:03:16Z
dc.date.available2020-01-30T15:03:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-07
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/323377
dc.description.abstractThere are many disparities between urban and suburban schools, including the adoption of innovations (Huberman & Miles, 2013). This study examined the Diffusion of Innovations theory (Rogers, 2003) and its potential application to urban and suburban Oklahoma schools. The purpose of the study was to identify key elements that indicate the diffusion of innovations in urban and suburban schools. The methods of data collection for the study were survey research and document analysis. Information related to the diffusion of innovations in urban and suburban Oklahoma schools, characteristics of innovative schools and descriptions of innovative teaching practices were gathered from 145 participants who completed the survey. A Kruskal-Wallis Test was conducted to examine the differences in Profile of Instructional Technology Use in Schools scores, levels of expertise with technology, and levels of importance of methods for learning about technology according to the district type and role of each participant. Significant differences were found between urban and suburban parents, teachers and staff (χ2 = 66.81, p < .001, df = 5). The results indicated that participants who regard themselves as being members of an urban school district had significantly lower Profile of Instructional Technology Use in Schools scores than Suburban members.
dc.description.abstractThe results indicated that participants who identified themselves as Suburban Teachers had significantly higher Profile of Instructional Technology Use in Schools scores than participants in other roles and district types. There was also very strong evidence (p < 0.001, adjusted using the Bonferroni correction) of a difference between groups in Profile of Instructional Technology Use in Schools scores. Urban parents, teachers, and staff are significantly different from one another, and this finding suggests that innovations are diffusing at different rates in than with suburban parents, teachers, and staff. This is significant for urban schools because it speaks to the differences in innovations being diffused. Innovations are diffusing differently throughout urban school districts, which contrasts with how innovations are being diffused in suburban school districts. Characteristics of innovative schools, definitions of innovative teaching practices, levels of expertise with educational technologies used in schools, educational budgets and perceptions of the use of educational technologies by teachers are key elements that indicate the perceptions of the diffusion of innovations in selected Oklahoma urban and suburban schools.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleDiffusion of Innovations in Urban and Suburban Oklahoma School Districts
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDavis, R. Evan
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStansberry, Susan
dc.contributor.committeeMemberThompson, Penny
osu.filenameBrownIII_okstate_0664D_16341.pdf
osu.accesstypeOpen Access
dc.type.genreDissertation
dc.type.materialText
dc.subject.keywordsdiffusion of innovations
dc.subject.keywordseducation
dc.subject.keywordspublic school
dc.subject.keywordstechnology
thesis.degree.disciplineEducation
thesis.degree.grantorOklahoma State University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record