Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRagan, Tillman,en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Mary Etta.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:18:16Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:18:16Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/322
dc.description.abstractSixty-one undergraduate students participated in the study. The Group Embedded Figures Tests was used to classify subjects as field dependent or field independent learners. The design of the study was a pretest/posttest control group design. Two independent variables were employed in this study: (a) conceptual model provision/nonconceptual model provision and (b) cognitive style characteristic (i.e., FD/FI). The dependent variables were: (a) posttest scores, (b) length of engagement with instructional materials. Data were analyzed using several statistical analyses: t-tests, univariate analysis of variance, and stepwise multiple regression analyses.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe results of the study revealed no significant main effect of conceptual model provision and no interaction effect of conceptual model provision and cognitive style characteristic (FD/FI) using scores from Posttest 1 and Posttest 2. FD/FI was found to be statistically significant on Posttest 1. FI subjects performed significantly better than FD subjects. The results also revealed no significant main or interaction effect for conceptual model provision and cognitive style characteristic on length of engagement with photography simulation Exploratory data analysis showed that Pretest performance were significantly correlated with Posttest 2 performance and that gain scores were significantly correlated with performance on both the Pretest and GEFT. From the results, the researcher concluded that conceptual model provision did not prove to be statistically significant; however, the cognitive style characteristic of FD/FI was statistically significant in terms of performance on Posttest 1. FI subjects performed better in the exploratory learning environment than did FD subjects on Posttest 1 and Posttest 2. FI subjects also spent more time engaging with the highly exploratory photography simulation. Due to the lack of significant findings for conceptual model provision and length of engagement with the photography simulation, more empirical research is suggested.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe primary purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of conceptual model provision and a cognitive style characteristic (i.e., field-dependence/field independence) on problem-solving performance in an exploratory learning environment. A second issue investigated was the role of individual differences, more specifically cognitive style, in mental model development and problem solving in an exploratory learning environment. In addition, this study investigated what effects prior knowledge, prior experience with photography, computer playfulness, and interest in photography have on problem solving of FD/FI learners.en_US
dc.format.extentix, 173 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Educational Psychology.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Technology of.en_US
dc.subjectLearning, Psychology of.en_US
dc.subjectIndividual differences.en_US
dc.subjectCognitive styles.en_US
dc.subjectProblem solving Psychological aspects.en_US
dc.titleThe effects of conceptual model provision and cognitive style on problem-solving performance of learners engaged in an exploratory learning environment.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Psychologyen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-03, Section: A, page: 0983.en_US
dc.noteAdviser: Tillman Ragan.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3009545en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Psychology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record