Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllis, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-06T20:00:18Z
dc.date.available2019-09-06T20:00:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/321407
dc.description.abstractThere are basically three things wrong with the UNP TIF: 1) It has failed to deliver on the high-end, regional-draw retail which it promised. 2) It diverts tax income from higher priority uses. 3) Expenditures in the TIF create a competitive disadvantage for non-TIF areas of Norman. The proposed new project plan for the UNP TIF only partly addresses the tax diversion issue; it exacerbates the other problems. All of this has distributive justice implication.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEconomics, General.en_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy - applieden_US
dc.titleAgainst the Proposed New UNP Project Planen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.description.peerreviewNoen_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Philosophyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International