NEtwork MObility (NEMO) supports the mobility of multiple Internet-connected devices. However, NEMO Basic Support Protocol suffers from unoptimized route leading to large latency in communication and header overhead. To optimize route, a plethora of schemes have been proposed. These schemes differ in terms of several performance parameters, such as signaling, end-to-end delay and

handoff latency. However, no performance or cost evaluation exists in the literature to compare the schemes. In addition, mobility management is required to support the mobility of Internet-connected devices in satellite networks. Existing mobility management solutions for satellite networks are unable to

provide connectivity to the Internet when satellites are not directly connected to the ground.

In this dissertation, a comprehensive evaluation of the schemes and a mobility management solution for satellite networks using NEMO are provided. The schemes are classified and compared to choose the optimal class. Using analytical and simulation-based models, the schemes in the chosen class are compared based on the performance parameters. The effect of the parameters on transmission Control Protocol, the dominant transport protocol in the Internet, is also evaluated. A cost evaluation is performed to determine the network resource consumption of the schemes. Finally, an architecture and extensions of the basic protocol are presented to apply NEMO in satellite networks. This dissertation fosters the application of NEMO to terrestrial and satellite

networks by selecting and extending optimal route optimization schemes, and presenting new architecture and protocol.