Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBuckley, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Chanda
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-06T16:00:07Z
dc.date.available2018-08-06T16:00:07Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/301373
dc.description.abstractResearch has shown that negative emotions can influence the decision-making process and contribute to unethical behavior. It was hypothesized that mindfulness would decrease negative emotions and reduce their impact in the decision-making process compared to cognitive reappraisal, thereby resulting in less cheating on an anagram task. Participants were asked to complete ten days of emotion regulation techniques in mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal, or were given no training prior to data collection where the emotions of frustration, anger, or no emotion were elicited before engaging in the trained emotion regulation exercise. Participants completed an anagram task and self-scored and reported results via an online survey system. Results were tested with the Carbonless Anagram Method (CAM), where we found no significant difference between groups. Reasons for lack of findings and future directions are discussed.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectMindfulnessen_US
dc.subjectEthical Decision Makingen_US
dc.subjectEmotionsen_US
dc.titleLoosening the Emotions that Bind - Mindfulness and Ethical Decision Makingen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberConnelly, Shane
dc.contributor.committeeMemberTerry, Robert
dc.date.manuscript2018-07-24
dc.thesis.degreeMaster of Scienceen_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Psychologyen_US
shareok.orcid0000-0003-0433-3710en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record