Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPranter, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Kelsey
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T13:23:38Z
dc.date.available2018-05-15T13:23:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/299922
dc.description.abstractThe stratigraphic variability of fluvial architectural elements and their internal lithological and petrophysical heterogeneity influence static connectivity and fluid flow. To explore the impact of fluvial architecture and facies heterogeneity on reservoir performance, well-exposed outcrops of the Cretaceous Burro Canyon Formation in Rattlesnake Canyon, Colorado, are evaluated. Analysis of the sedimentology and channel architecture of the Burro Canyon Formation provides insights into the low net- to-gross ratio, sandy, braided-fluvial style. The Burro Canyon Formation represents a South Saskatchewan type, perennial, braided fluvial system. A single depositional sequence is present in Rattlesnake Canyon containing a series of stacked amalgamated and semi-amalgamated channel complexes, composed of four architectural elements: amalgamated channel complexes, amalgamated fluvial-bar deposits, isolated fluvial-bar deposits, and floodplain fines. Stratigraphic measured sections, outcrop gamma-ray measurements, and UAV- based (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-based) photogrammetry are used to constrain two- dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) static reservoir models of the fluvial deposits. Resulting breakthrough times (BTT) and sweep efficiency suggest subsurface performance is most effective perpendicular to paleoflow direction in amalgamated channel sequences. Perpendicular to paleoflow, BTT occurs 9% faster than parallel to the paleoflow and sweep efficiency is, on average, 16% greater. Sweep efficiency and BTT are greater perpendicular to paleoflow due to greater sandstone connectivity in this orientation. Variability of preserved channels and lateral pitchouts results in lower recovery efficiency. Reservoir heterogeneity can account for 50% variation in BTT and lower recovery efficiency by 5% through low petrophysical zones that trap fluids. Cemented conglomeratic facies decrease recovery efficiency by 15%, but increase sweep efficiency and BTT by 28% and 32%, respectively, creating fluid-flow barriers as conglomeratic facies fill basal scours in the Burro Canyon Formation.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectGeology.en_US
dc.subjectReservoir Modelingen_US
dc.subjectPiceance Basinen_US
dc.subjectBurro Canyon Formationen_US
dc.titleFLUVIAL ARCHITECTURE OF THE BURRO CANYON FORMATION USING UAV-BASED PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND OUTCROP-BASED MODELING: IMPLICATIONS FOR RESERVOIR PERFORMANCE, RATTLESNAKE CANYON, SOUTHWESTERN PICEANCE BASIN, COLORADOen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCole, Rex
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSlatt, Roger
dc.date.manuscript2018
dc.thesis.degreeMaster of Scienceen_US
ou.groupMewbourne College of Earth and Energy::Conoco Phillips School of Geology and Geophysicsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record