Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndrew M. Wood
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:34:55Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:51Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:34:55Z
dc.date.issued2004-10-01
dc.identifier.citationWood, A. M. (2004). Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications. Urban Studies, 41(11), 2103-2118. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000268366en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25493
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of the urban regime and growth machine concepts beyond the US remains a matter of considerable debate. Some argue that these frameworks retain considerable value so long as they are 'properly' applied and that recent concerns about the limits to these frameworks result from no more than their 'misapplication'. I critically examine this argument through a review of recent work on the mobilisation of business interests in British cities. The central claim is that, even when focused on the 'right' issues and questions, US frameworks quickly exhaust their explanatory capacity. In the context of a widening diversity of alternative approaches, I suggest that it is time to move squarely beyond growth coalition and regime accounts. The paper makes a number of suggestions for ways in which this new phase of theory building might proceed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUrban Studies
dc.titleDomesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applicationsen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0042098042000268366en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record