Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMark P. Sharfman
dc.contributor.authorTammie S. Pinkston
dc.contributor.authorThomas D. Sigerstad
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:34:43Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:27Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:34:43Z
dc.date.issued2000-06-01
dc.identifier.citationSharfman, M. P., Pinkston, T. S., & Sigerstad, T. D. (2000). The Effects of Managerial Values on Social Issues Evaluation: An Empirical Examination. Business & Society, 39(2), 144-182. doi: 10.1177/000765030003900203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25260
dc.description.abstractThis article suggests that due to the value-laden nature of social issues, managerial values, as a framework or schema, play an important role in the social issues evaluation process. Our data show that there is clearly a relationship between the issues managers evaluate as important and the values of those managers, with values being defined according to the Carroll typology—economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. It was apparent that the values held by the managers sampled determined how various sets of issues—community, political, and regulatory—were evaluated in terms of importance. This result suggests that the issues evaluation process, which should be objective, is not.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBusiness & Society
dc.titleThe Effects of Managerial Values on Social Issues Evaluation: An Empirical Examinationen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/000765030003900203en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record