Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJamie L. Carson
dc.contributor.authorMichael H. Crespin
dc.contributor.authorAnthony J. Madonna
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:34:28Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:26Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.identifier.citationCarson, J. L., Crespin, M. H., & Madonna, A. J. (2014). Procedural Signaling, Party Loyalty, and Traceability in the U.S. House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 729-742. doi: 10.1177/1065912914536469en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25252
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we take advantage of a new source of data providing updates from the Majority Leader’s Office that signal the leadership’s positions on floor votes. We offer a more nuanced explanation of voting in the U.S. House as our findings suggest that not all procedural votes are created equal. While the most liberal members of the party vote with the leadership on procedural votes at high rates and nearly 100 percent of the time when signaled by the majority leader, moderate members are significantly less likely to support the party and are not responsive to these signals.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPolitical Research Quarterly
dc.subjectlegislative processen_US
dc.subjectparty loyaltyen_US
dc.subjectsignalingen_US
dc.subjecttraceabilityen_US
dc.titleProcedural Signaling, Party Loyalty, and Traceability in the U.S. House of Representativesen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1065912914536469en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record