Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJames W. Douglas
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:36:30Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:08Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:36:30Z
dc.date.issued1999-09-01
dc.identifier.citationDouglas, J. W. (1999). Redirection in Georgia: A New Type of Budget Reform. The American Review of Public Administration, 29(3), 269-289. doi: 10.1177/02750749922064445en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25087
dc.description.abstractThe budgeting reform literature is replete with examples of reforms such as performance budgeting, program budgeting, and zero-base budgeting that have failed to achieve their stated goals. This article analyzes a new budgetary reform that has been introduced in the state of Georgia, which appears to be accomplishing what its proponents have pronounced. This reform is known as redirection. The article defines redirection, explains how it works, and shows that redirection has enabled budget actors to reset budgetary priorities and reduce agency acquisitiveness, at least in its first 2 years in operation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe American Review of Public Administration
dc.titleRedirection in Georgia: A New Type of Budget Reformen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/02750749922064445en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record