Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScott Lamothe
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:37:01Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:06Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:37:01Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-27
dc.identifier.citationLamothe, S. (2014). How Competitive Is “Competitive” Procurement in the Social Services? The American Review of Public Administration. doi: 10.1177/0275074013520563en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25069
dc.description.abstractThe scholarship on contracting generally argues that markets for social services are weak and lacking in competition. Using data gathered from Florida’s largest social service agency, the Department of Children and Families, this article adds to the discussion by constructing a more rigorous measure of competition that accounts for the quality of bidding entities. The findings indicate that while the measures used in earlier studies align reasonably well with the raw number of initial responders to competitive solicitations, they tend to overestimate competition when the quality component is included in the analysis. That is, social service markets may be even weaker than previously reported. Furthermore, an examination of the relationship between competition and performance fails to find a significant association.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe American Review of Public Administration
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjectcontractingen_US
dc.subjectcompetitionen_US
dc.subjectsocial servicesen_US
dc.titleHow Competitive Is “Competitive” Procurement in the Social Services?en_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0275074013520563en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record