Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrett S. Sharp
dc.contributor.authorSteven W. Housel
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:36:53Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:06Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:36:53Z
dc.date.issued2004-03-01
dc.identifier.citationSharp, B. S., & Housel, S. W. (2004). Ghosts in the Bureaucratic Machine: Resurrecting the Principles of Administration in the Oklahoma Health Department. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), 20-35. doi: 10.1177/0275074003259234en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25062
dc.description.abstractAn Oklahoma health department scandal erupted when the acting director was arrested for taking a bribe. More revelations quickly followed, including the existence of multiple “ghost employees” on payroll but having no identifiable job functions. More than 30 employees were terminated. Many faced criminal prosecution. TheTulsa World reported that malfeasance at the agency might have contributed to as many as 1,000 deaths in state nursing homes. The state’s governor assigned a cabinet secretary to rectify the situation. In telling the story of an agency’s denigration and eventual rebirth, the authors argue that no substitute exists for institutional regard for basic administrative principles. They revisit the work of Fayol and Gulick, two pioneers within the principles of administration school. Despite long-standing criticisms, their approach seems strongly validated in light of an agency that lost its way by ignoring fundamentals and was set back on course by an administrator who valued them.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe American Review of Public Administration
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjectprinciplesen_US
dc.subjectethicsen_US
dc.subjecttrusten_US
dc.subjectadministrative reformen_US
dc.titleGhosts in the Bureaucratic Machine: Resurrecting the Principles of Administration in the Oklahoma Health Departmenten_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0275074003259234en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record