Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDonald J. Maletz
dc.contributor.authorJerry Herbel
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:53:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:36:54Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:53:05Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:36:54Z
dc.date.issued2000-03-01
dc.identifier.citationMaletz, D. J., & Herbel, J. (2000). Beyond Idealism: Democracy and Ethics Reform. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(1), 19-45. doi: 10.1177/02750740022064533en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25060
dc.description.abstractThe effort to oppose corruption has brought in recent decades a heightened emphasis on ethics, the establishment of official ethics codes, the creation of the first government agencies explicitly authorized to enforce ethics, and even the creation of ethics committees in Congress. Dennis Thompson has taken the lead in advocating and analyzing the increased attention to ethics, and yet one of his more recent studies draws attention to some “paradoxes” inherent in the pursuit of ethics in government. We take issue with Thompson’s argument that ethics is in some sense the most important of all policies. The hope for “ethics in government” may only be satisfied at a very modest level through the work of the current ethics agencies, the enforcement of ethics in government can impose important costs on the ethics project itself, and the democratic processes of government may limit what we should do to constrain the power of self-interest.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe American Review of Public Administration
dc.titleBeyond Idealism: Democracy and Ethics Reformen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/02750740022064533en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record