Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorL. Peter Schwiebert
dc.contributor.authorAlan B. Davis
dc.contributor.authorM. Alex Jacocks
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:52:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:33:14Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:52:59Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:33:14Z
dc.date.issued1992-06-01
dc.identifier.citationSchwiebert, L. P., Davis, A. B., & Jacocks, M. A. (1992). Reproducibility of Oral Exam Grades and Correlation with Other Measures of Performance on Three Required Third-Year Clerkships. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 15(2), 221-230. doi: 10.1177/016327879201500206en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/25003
dc.description.abstractThe oral examination is one of the traditional measures of student performance during clinical clerkships. Other studies have compared oral exams, written exams, and clinicalperformance, finding an unequal correlation among them and poor reproducibility of scores among examiners. This study of a third-year class on three required clerkships found a stronger correlation between oral exam performance and cumulative grade point average (GPA) than had previously been reported between oral exams and written or clinical grades and also found high reproducibility across clerkships, both overall and within class quartiles. These findings argue for wider use of the oral exam as an evaluation instrument on clinical clerkships.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEvaluation & the Health Professions
dc.titleReproducibility of Oral Exam Grades and Correlation with Other Measures of Performance on Three Required Third-Year Clerkshipsen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/016327879201500206en_US
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record