dc.contributor.advisor | Berkeley, David S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Doyel, Carolyn Sue | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-10-14T21:36:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-10-14T21:36:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1976-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11244/19553 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study is concerned with setting forth an exact and limiting explanation of Biblical typology. The primary objective here is to demonstrate that when Biblical typology is misunderstood and misapplied to interpret literature, the interpretations may be incorrect. The Bible and some of the writings on the subject by the classical Bible exegetes are used to define and explain Biblical typology. Articles and books by authors who have used Biblical typology to interpret and comment on certain works of literature are used to demostrate what I believe to be errors in the use of Biblical typology. | |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Oklahoma State University | |
dc.rights | Copyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material. | |
dc.title | Some Misapplications of Biblical Typology in Recent Literary Scholarship | |
dc.type | text | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Keeler, Clinton | |
osu.filename | Thesis-1976-D753s.pdf | |
osu.accesstype | Open Access | |
dc.description.department | English | |
dc.type.genre | Thesis | |