Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMumford, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-10T13:23:20Z
dc.date.available2015-07-10T13:23:20Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/15223
dc.description.abstractCharismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) leaders use different mental models to understand and interpret the world. The present study uses this framework to gain a better understanding of how outstanding leaders interact and influence both proximal and distal followers. Participants engaged in a low-fidelity simulation, and their subsequent mental models and performance were analyzed to answer several research questions. First, how does leadership style influence creative outcomes? And second, how does leader-follower congruence of mental models relate to performance? These research questions were tested using a low-fidelity situation calling for creative problem-solving. Results indicate that leadership style does not have differential effects on follower performance but does interact with leader distance such that followers of charismatic leaders perform better with a low leader distance and followers of pragmatic leaders perform better with a higher leader distance. Lastly, mental model congruence may have some effects on the performance of followers. The implications of these findings for theory and practice are discussed.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectcreativityen_US
dc.subjectfollowershipen_US
dc.subjectleadershipen_US
dc.titleFollower Mental Models and Outstanding Leadershipen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBuckley, Michael
dc.contributor.committeeMemberConnelly, Shane
dc.contributor.committeeMemberTerry, Robert
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDay, Eric
dc.date.manuscript2015
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Psychologyen_US
shareok.nativefileaccessrestricteden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record