Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAdam, Brian D.
dc.contributor.authorGe, Candi
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-17T20:05:57Z
dc.date.available2015-06-17T20:05:57Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/14845
dc.description.abstractTraceability in food supply chains has many potential benefits, including increased food safety, more efficient supply chain management, and greater opportunities for providing value-added products to consumers. In the case of livestock, traceability can provide enhanced disease prevention and mitigation. For these reasons and more, many major beef producing countries have implemented beef traceability systems. Of these, some are mandatory (such as European Union, Canada, Mexico, and Japan) while other countries such as the U.S. have encouraged voluntary systems. Especially where traceability systems are voluntary, in order for a large number of producers to participate in a whole-chain traceability system, they must believe that the benefits outweigh the costs.In this study, we estimate the benefits relative to the costs of implementing a whole-chain-traceability-system (WCTS) in a supply chain composed of three stages: cow-calf producer, feedlot, slaughter/packing plant, by selecting genetics that produce beef that is more tender than average. As a first step in estimating benefits of WCTS, separate from effects of market linkages between stages of supply chain, we provide upper-bound estimates by assuming a vertically-integrated company. Profits in two scenarios are estimated and compared. In Scenario I, the enterprise uses artificial insemination to select favorable genes, implements a WCTS to track and trace genetically-improved animals, and tests for beef tenderness. In Scenario II, the enterprise chooses not to use artificial insemination or WCTS, so there is no improvement in the distribution of genotypes. Results show that revenue could increase by $58.53/head, compared to additional costs of $5/head for implementing WCTS and $16/head extra cost for using artificial insemination for improving beef tenderness, and costs of testing for beef tenderness. If tenderness testing costs less than $37.53/head, or if other benefits of implementing WCTS can be realized, there is incentive for such a company to implement WCTS for the purpose of improving beef tenderness.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherOklahoma State University
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleValue of a Whole-chain Traceability System in Transmitting Genetic Information about Beef Tenderness
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.committeeMemberChung, Chanjin
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPeel, Derrell
osu.filenameGE_okstate_0664M_13580.pdf
osu.accesstypeOpen Access
dc.description.departmentAgricultural Economics
dc.type.genreThesis
dc.subject.keywordsbeef cattle
dc.subject.keywordsbeef tenderness
dc.subject.keywordsbenefits-costs
dc.subject.keywordswhole-chain traceability


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record