Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKramer, Eric Mark
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Tyler J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-21T19:51:07Z
dc.date.available2015-04-21T19:51:07Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/14439
dc.description.abstractPowerful semiotic signs like the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall served significant communicative functions. The modern culture of nation state wall building continues despite the fact that the security fences are obsolete. Wall advocates argue that security fences deter undocumented immigrants from trying to cross the border illegally. The walls also function to stop terrorism or other criminal threats. This paper applies semiotic and hermeneutic methods to examine and compare the communication functions of South African apartheid with the U.S. Mexico border wall. Structuration Theory (ST),and Dissociation and Dimensional Accrual (DAD) are applied to discuss the consequences to communication from such barriers.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectStructuration Theoryen_US
dc.subjectDissociation and Dimensional Accrual (DAD)en_US
dc.subjectBorderlandsen_US
dc.subjectWalls and Fencesen_US
dc.titleCOMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS OF SOUTH AFRICA APARTHEID AND THE U.S. MEXICO SECURITY FENCEen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberO'Neill, Sean
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRodriguez, Clemencia
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHsieh, Elaine
dc.contributor.committeeMemberReedy, Justin
dc.date.manuscript2015
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Communicationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record