Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Kenneth Lee
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T21:17:58Z
dc.date.available2015-01-27T21:17:58Z
dc.date.issued1989-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/14160
dc.description.abstractField experiments were conducted to determine the influence of winter wheat seeding date and forage removal on the efficacy of cheat control herbicides, forage and grain yields, and net returns to land, overhead, risk, and management for the various cheat control strategies. Economic analysis revealed that net returns were higher when wheat was seeded during the traditional seeding period than when seeded early for increased forage production or delayed for cultural cheat control. Some herbicide applications provided an economic benefit at two of three locations where the initial cheat population exceeded 170 plants/m2 . Nomenclature: Cyanazine, 2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2- yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile; ethyl-metribuzin (BAY SMY 1500), 4- amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(ethylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4tl)-one; metribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin- 5(4tl)-one; cheat, Bromus secalinus L.# 3 BROSE; wheat, Triticum aestivum L.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherOklahoma State University
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleEconomic Returns from Cheat Control in Winter Wheat
dc.typetext
osu.filenameThesis-1989-F383e.pdf
osu.accesstypeOpen Access
dc.description.departmentAgronomy
dc.type.genreThesis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record