dc.contributor.author | Baines, Lawrence | |
dc.contributor.author | Stanley, Gregory Kent | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-04T16:42:53Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-30T15:33:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-04T16:42:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-30T15:33:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11244/13641 | |
dc.description | The version of this article that is archived here is the author's post-print. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Some forces that undermine programs for the gifted—misguided fiscal policies, simplistic teaching methodologies, and a resurgence of the philosophy of egalitarianism—are reviewed. Analogous to the demise (and possible resurgence) of programs for the gifted is the evolution of women's sports since the 1920s | en_US |
dc.language | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Roeper Review;25(1): 11-13 | |
dc.subject | Education, Philosophy of. | en_US |
dc.subject | Education, Elementary. | en_US |
dc.subject | Education, Secondary. | en_US |
dc.title | Celebrating Mediocrity?: How Schools Shortchange Gifted Students | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.peerreview | Yes | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02783190209554190 | en_US |