Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWong, Norman
dc.contributor.authorSchartel Dunn, Stephanie G.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-07T17:50:08Z
dc.date.available2014-11-07T17:50:08Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/13619
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses the role parasocial interaction has on perceptions of credibility, especially in terms of political commentators. Parasocial interaction and the concept of entertainment education create a framework to explore how people react to persuasive messages from political commentators. After assessing the impact of parasocial interrelations, assessments were made concerning viewers’ likelihood of elaboration, attitude and behavior change. It was found that higher PSI levels generated more positive message evaluations, higher assessments of source credibility, decreased counter-arguing, and increased likelihood for attitude and behavior change.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectPoliticsen_US
dc.subjectPSIen_US
dc.titlePicking Our Pundits: Identifying Factors of Source Credibility in Politicsen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberJohnson, Tyler
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEdy, Jill
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMeirick, Patrick
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHansen, Glenn
dc.date.manuscript2014-11-03
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Communicationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record