Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXiao, Jian
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-29T21:57:01Z
dc.date.available2014-09-29T21:57:01Z
dc.date.issued1996-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/12666
dc.description.abstractThis thesis uses content analysis to examine the possible bias in coverage of President Bill Clinton and House Speaker Newt Gingrich in Time, Newsweek, and U. S. News & World report, from January 1, 1995, to April 14, 1995. The study uses John C. Merrill's method: bias were divided into six types--adjective bias, adverbial bias, attribution bias, outright opinion, contextual bias,and photographic bias The bias were also decided as positive and negative. The result shows that the three magazines' coverage of the two politicians was not totally balanced: Newsweek showed more negative bias toward Speaker Gingrich, while Time and U. S. News & World Report showed more negative bias toward President Clinton in their coverage during the period.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherOklahoma State University
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleCoverage of Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich in Time, Newsweek, and U. S. News & World Report During the First 100 Days of the 104th Congress: a Bias Study
dc.typetext
osu.filenameThesis-1996-X6c.pdf
osu.accesstypeOpen Access
dc.type.genreThesis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record