Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGriffith, Priscilla L.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorHurst, Sylvia Kay Fletcher.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:20:42Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:20:42Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/1208
dc.description.abstractA repeated measures analysis suggested both teacher read-aloud and silent reading were appropriate for student learning but results do not support either method as superior over the other. Multiple regression analyses were conducted on the posttest and delayed posttest scores as the dependent measured, had a significant relationship between treatment by reading ability interaction on one analysis. Regression equations constructed for each level of the treatment indicated that as reading ability increases, students received more benefits from the teacher read-aloud procedure.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study was a counterbalanced design gathering both quantitative and qualitative data for analysis from two treatment procedures. Seventh and eighth grade students were given the reading portion of the SAT-9 to provide a national percentile ranking in reading. All students then participated in two consecutive units of study: one unit requiring students to read the science text silently and the second unit providing a teacher read-aloud of all text. The classroom procedures, assignments, and related activities were exactly the same for both treatments. Student learning was measured with pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest concept map scores on each unit of study.en_US
dc.description.abstractA survey administered at the end of the study examined student attitudes toward the teacher read-aloud and served as the source for in-depth interviews concerning preference for or dislike of the teacher read-aloud strategy. An interview with the science teacher provided another outlook on the oral reading treatment.en_US
dc.description.abstractA correlation compared reading ability with attitude toward teacher read-aloud. Seventy-eight of the participants had a positive attitude toward the intervention, with no students reading below the 50th percentile showing disapproval. Interview responses supported these results since all below average readers favor the oral presentation. Overall themes from the interviews offered advantages and disadvantages of teacher read-aloud, suggestions for implementation, and a teacher's perspective on practical applications in science classes.en_US
dc.description.abstractHaving been established as an important component of early literacy development, the use of teacher read-aloud as an instructional strategy has the potential to benefit adolescent students. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect teacher read-aloud had on adolescent learning in science and how the results varied according to individual reading ability.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 124 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectLecture method in teaching.en_US
dc.subjectScience Study and teaching (Middle school)en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Sciences.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Reading.en_US
dc.titleAn examination of the effect of teacher read-aloud on adolescent attitudes and learning in science.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculumen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-04, Section: A, page: 1385.en_US
dc.noteAdviser: Priscilla L. Griffith.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3263435en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculum


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record