Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTao, Jill,en_US
dc.contributor.authorCrouse, Patricia Anne.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:20:21Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:20:21Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/1078
dc.description.abstractThis study looks at how Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) get implemented and once implemented, how they are monitored and achieve compliance. Implementation is looked at through the lens of historical institutionalism. Within this framework, the issues of sovereignty, collective action, capacity building, and resources are evaluated. This is done through the analysis of the National Reports submitted by the parties to the agreements and an original paper interview mailed out to the implementing agencies of the MEAs studied.en_US
dc.description.abstractImplementation theory has been a central focus of the policy process. How a policy gets implemented can take many forms. Implementation can take a top-down approach, a bottom-up approach, or an approach that combines the two. Most scholarship today looks at these various approaches from the perspective of a single, small-scale policy problem.en_US
dc.format.extentv, 140 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental law, International.en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, General.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences.en_US
dc.titleMultilateral environmental agreements: The challenge of implementation.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Political Scienceen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-06, Section: A, page: 2303.en_US
dc.noteAdviser: Jill Tao.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3222157en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Political Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record