Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNoley, Grayson,en_US
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Joan K.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorPollard, Stan.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:20:19Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:20:19Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/1070
dc.description.abstractAn inductive phenomenological study was conducted using eight GED recipients who had attempted higher education at a four-year university with this researcher's own experiences included. Four members of the study were successful in the completion of their desired degree. Each recipient was interviewed and their personal history analyzed for relevant themes. The analysis of these personal histories revealed themes within both groups and one substantial theme shared by both. The relevant themes that emerged within the successful group were: Career driven majors; Uninterrupted attendance, and Family support. Within the non-successful group the themes were: Women's struggle with multiple roles; Abusive relationships; and Two-year college enrollment. The shared theme was: Poor quality of instruction.en_US
dc.description.abstractFor over a half century the General Educational Development Test (GED) has been accepted as an equivalent to an earned high school diploma, which can then be used by the successful recipient to gain access into institutions of higher education. Research has shown that the majority of this population is seeking to advance their present status by working toward a degree in higher education. However, research has also shown that members of this population are at a greater risk than their traditional and non-traditional counterparts for not completing their educational goals.en_US
dc.description.abstractStudies have been done over the years that tract the success/failure ratios of these students compared to traditional students, but these studies do not illuminate the differences between the successful and non-successful GED recipients who attempt higher education. The purpose of this research was to investigate these differences and see which, if any, were correctable impediments that could be used to help other GED recipients wishing to attempt higher education in the future.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 135 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectCollege dropouts.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Higher.en_US
dc.subjectGED testsen_US
dc.subjectAcademic achievement.en_US
dc.subjectHigh school dropouts Education (Higher) United States.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Adult and Continuing.en_US
dc.titleFactors in successful GED recipients in higher education.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Leadership and Policy Studiesen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-05, Section: A, page: 1669.en_US
dc.noteAdvisers: Joan K. Smith; Grayson Noley.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3220373en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record