Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTan, David L.,en_US
dc.contributor.advisorWeber, Jerome C.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorEaton, Timothy W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:20:19Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:20:19Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/1067
dc.description.abstractThe researcher conducted nine interviews with high achieving first-generation college students who were able to overcome difficulties in order to gain access to higher education, persist through the maze of obstacles that confronts all students, and attain advanced degrees on the path to the professoriate. Analysis of the interviews followed the constant comparison method. Two in vivo codes emerged out of the data. First, the seeker code reflects the internal drive and observable behaviors common to the high achieving first-generation college students who served as interview participants. Second, the navigator code represents the range of individual relationships that facilitated the development or empowerment of the seeker. The navigators observable functions were as follows: adviser, champion, coach, confidant, classic mentor/protegee, facilitator, guide, protector, role model, sponsor, teacher, or tutor.en_US
dc.description.abstractThese two in vivo codes were interrelated with code constructs for parental influence, pre-college experience, institutional selection, persistence factors, attainment qualities, educational attainment, and career choice in order to explain the phenomenon. The theory that developed is grounded in the data gathered in this study. Prior to entry into college each of these high achieving first-generation college students (seekers) exhibited at least two out of four positive factors: academic success, college expectation, culture of possibilities, or models of hard work. Eight of the participants earned a Ph.D. and one a J.D. followed by an MLIS and all are currently employed in a doctoral granting institution. All participants experienced both negative and positive factors during their higher education. The cumulative influence did not prevent these individuals from earning advanced degrees and gaining access into the professoriate.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 266 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Adult and Continuing.en_US
dc.subjectMotivation (Psychology) Case studies.en_US
dc.subjectCollege teachers Psychology.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Higher.en_US
dc.subjectFirst-generation college students Psychology.en_US
dc.subjectMotivation in education Case studies.en_US
dc.subjectSuccessful people Psychology.en_US
dc.titlePath to the professoriate for high-achieving, first-generation college students.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Leadership and Policy Studiesen_US
dc.noteAdvisers: Jerome C. Weber; David L. Tan.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-05, Section: A, page: 1665.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3220370en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record