Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSutter, Daniel,en_US
dc.contributor.authorOller, Jeremy David.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:20:10Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:20:10Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/1051
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines whether state laws to prevent below cost sales provide protection for small businesses beyond the protection afforded by the federal antitrust laws. The paper first identifies the theoretical implications of state sales below cost laws. I find that there are various circumstances when the state law will provide additional protection to the federal predatory pricing laws. The uniqueness of the empirical section of this paper is based on the functional form of the tests and the distinctive features of the state laws used to discern the laws impact on small businesses. I find that state laws do have a small impact on the viability of small businesses in certain industries. Additionally, the differences among the state laws also have an impact on the percentage of small businesses in a state. However, the effects of these laws are relatively understated and potentially inconsistent with the goals of competition.en_US
dc.format.extentviii, 134 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectLoss leaders Law and legislation United States States.en_US
dc.subjectLaw.en_US
dc.subjectSmall business United States.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness Administration, Management.en_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Commerce-Business.en_US
dc.titleDo sales below cost laws protect small businesses?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Economicsen_US
dc.noteAdviser: Daniel Sutter.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-04, Section: A, page: 1459.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3217534en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Economics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record