Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVaughn, Courtney,en_US
dc.contributor.advisorGarn, Gregg,en_US
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Kathy Thomas.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:20:07Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:20:07Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/1028
dc.description.abstractThe juxtaposition of the quest for reaching accountability benchmarks and the desire for meeting students' individual needs has created a problem for district administration, site principals, and school staff. As a result, the stakeholders have struggled to redefine the way instructional and social support services are delivered to its rapidly changing students.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis new "era of accountability" has called for unique investigations into ways in which schools are meeting the new requirements. A mixed method study of one Title I elementary school in Oklahoma explored how a professional learning community (PLC) was both developed and implemented in this case. In addition, the study sought to explore how learning for both staff and students was affected. Like many districts that formerly identified themselves as "suburban, " the area in which this school is located has experienced rapidly changing demographics. This change has resulted in a student population that has compared to the district as a whole, a greater incidence of poverty, higher mobility rates, and a larger percentage of non-English speaking students. These factors have perpetuated a learning gap on both state and local assessments.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study attempted to tell the story of one school's search to create the best possible teaching and learning environment while meeting the current high-stakes accountability measures for student performance. This study sought to determine if, in this case, the establishment of professional learning communities was a viable strategy for addressing accountability demands while encouraging the use of best instructional practices. The analysis focused on the school's use of teacher collaboration as a means to facilitate conversation about teaching and learning, create common assessments, conduct data analyses, and reflect on how their goals were met.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn 2001, the most far-reaching educational accountability initiative was launched by the Bush administration. The No Child Left Behind Act required all students to show incremental growth toward mastery of state standards with all students demonstrating proficiency by 2014.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study indicated that increased student learning is strongly encouraged by the development of professional learning communities. In this case, the development of the PLC served as a means to focus the conversation on student achievement while encouraging collaboration among school staff as a means of addressing individual students' learning needs. The study also suggested that the development of meaningful community partnerships played an integral part in the PLC process.en_US
dc.format.extentxii, 146 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Teacher Training.en_US
dc.subjectSchool improvement programs Case studies.en_US
dc.subjectEducational change Case studies.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Curriculum and Instruction.en_US
dc.subjectTeam learning approach in education Case studies.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Elementary.en_US
dc.titleIt is the process, not the test: A mixed method study of a professional learning community at one elementary school in Oklahoma.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Leadership and Policy Studiesen_US
dc.noteAdvisers: Gregg Garn; Courtney Vaughn.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-03, Section: A, page: 0824.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3211366en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record