| dc.contributor.advisor | Hawthorne, James, | en_US |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Merrill, Kenneth, | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Barrett, Clint Ilsley. | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-08-16T12:20:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-16T12:20:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11244/1006 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Proslogion has long been seen to contain Saint Anselm's ontological Argument, although philosophers have differed in their opinions about exactly what constitutes this argument. An analysis of both the Proslogion and the multi-faceted context of Anselm reveals a more complicated and much stronger argument in the Proslogion than has previously been identified. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | vi, 127 leaves ; | en_US |
| dc.subject | God Proof, Ontological. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Theology. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Anselm, Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1033-1109. Proslogion. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Philosophy. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Literature, Classical. | en_US |
| dc.title | Anselm's ontological argument: Whole, unified, and complete. | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.thesis.degree | Ph.D. | en_US |
| dc.thesis.degreeDiscipline | Department of Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.note | Advisers: Kenneth Merrill; James Hawthorne. | en_US |
| dc.note | Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 0585. | en_US |
| ou.identifier | (UMI)AAI3207598 | en_US |
| ou.group | College of Arts and Sciences::Department of Philosophy | |
