Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarte, Traci
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Craig J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-10T19:29:12Z
dc.date.available2016-10-10T19:29:12Z
dc.date.issued2003-09
dc.identifier.citationCarte, T. A., & Russell, C. J. (2003). IN PURSUIT OF MODERATION: NINE COMMON ERRORS AND THEIR SOLUTIONS. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479-501.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/45400
dc.description.abstractOne result of the increasing sophistication and complexity of MIS theory and research is the number of studies hypothesizing and testing for moderation effects. A review of the MIS and broader management literatures suggests researchers investigating moderated relationships often commit one or more errors falling into three broad categories: inappropriate use or interpretation of statistics, misalignment of research design with phenomena of interest, and measurement or scaling issues. Examples of nine common errors are presented. Commission of these errors is expected to yield literatures characterized by mixed results at best, and thoroughly erroneous results at worse. Procedures representing examples of best practice and reporting guidelines are provided to help MIS investigators avoid or minimize these errors.en_US
dc.titleIN PURSUIT OF MODERATION: NINE COMMON ERRORS AND THEIR SOLUTIONSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnotesThis is a Sherpa RoMEO yellow journal.MIS Quarterly gives permission to authors to have their published articles included on an institutional repository subject to an embargo of five years from publication date. MIS Quarterly retains copyright of the articles, and the repository may not sell access to the work.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record