Katrina BedellSamuel HunterAmanda AngieAndrew Vert2016-01-142016-03-302016-01-142016-03-302006-06-01Bedell, K., Hunter, S., Angie, A., & Vert, A. (2006). A Historiometric Examination of Machiavellianism and a New Taxonomy of Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(4), 50-72. doi: 10.1177/107179190601200404http://hdl.handle.net/11244/25289Although researchers have extensively examined the relationship between charismatic leadership and Machiavellianism (Deluga, 2001; Gardner & Avolio, 1995; House & Howell, 1992), there has been a lack of investigation of Machiavellianism in relation to alternative forms of outstanding leadership. Thus, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the relationship between Machiavellianism and a new taxonomy of outstanding leadership comprised of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders. Using an historiometric approach, raters assessed Machiavellianism via the communications of 120 outstanding leaders in organizations across the domains of business, political, military, and religious institutions. Academic biographies were used to assess twelve general performance measures as well as twelve general controls and five communication specific controls. The results indicated that differing levels of Machiavellianism is evidenced across the differing leader types as well as differing leader orientation. Additionally, Machiavellianism appears negatively related to performance, though less so when type and orientation are taken into account.en-USResearch Article10.1177/107179190601200404false